Piggyback vs. fuel implant mode

DET3 technical support
Locked
csabirobert
Posts:2
Joined:Sun Mar 20, 2016 7:42 pm
Piggyback vs. fuel implant mode

Post by csabirobert » Fri Apr 01, 2016 7:33 am

Hi All!

I'm in turboed project on a stock NA car with low boost setup ca. 0.3bar. A read a lot in this forum, but it's not clear for me, what is the best way with DET3. Piggy back or fuel implant mode? The car stock map sensor based, I can change the stock map for 2.5bar stock fitted map from another model. Any advice? Thanks

WHPZach
Posts:184
Joined:Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:13 pm

Re: Piggyback vs. fuel implant mode

Post by WHPZach » Mon Apr 04, 2016 9:46 pm

FIT mode requires a LOT more tuning since you're turning the DET3 into a standalone fuel controller. For most customers I recommend using it in the normal configuration.

csabirobert
Posts:2
Joined:Sun Mar 20, 2016 7:42 pm

Re: Piggyback vs. fuel implant mode

Post by csabirobert » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:45 pm

WHPZach wrote:FIT mode requires a LOT more tuning since you're turning the DET3 into a standalone fuel controller. For most customers I recommend using it in the normal configuration.
Thanks for the reply. Maybe I'm an idiot, but I read the fit mode user manual a lot, and now the piggyback, but the fit mode cleaner for me.

Locked