Page 1 of 1

Piggyback vs. fuel implant mode

Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 7:33 am
by csabirobert
Hi All!

I'm in turboed project on a stock NA car with low boost setup ca. 0.3bar. A read a lot in this forum, but it's not clear for me, what is the best way with DET3. Piggy back or fuel implant mode? The car stock map sensor based, I can change the stock map for 2.5bar stock fitted map from another model. Any advice? Thanks

Re: Piggyback vs. fuel implant mode

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 9:46 pm
by WHPZach
FIT mode requires a LOT more tuning since you're turning the DET3 into a standalone fuel controller. For most customers I recommend using it in the normal configuration.

Re: Piggyback vs. fuel implant mode

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:45 pm
by csabirobert
WHPZach wrote:FIT mode requires a LOT more tuning since you're turning the DET3 into a standalone fuel controller. For most customers I recommend using it in the normal configuration.
Thanks for the reply. Maybe I'm an idiot, but I read the fit mode user manual a lot, and now the piggyback, but the fit mode cleaner for me.