Bugs and Feature reqests

All about our superior engine management unit.
Locked
oneten
Posts:22
Joined:Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:23 pm
Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by oneten » Wed Sep 07, 2016 11:36 am

There is still an issue with VSS & Gearbox Sensor in V 1.172

Please see thread: viewtopic.php?f=19&t=8808

pric
Posts:57
Joined:Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:41 pm
Location:Austria

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by pric » Thu Sep 08, 2016 12:51 am

Also

+1 for the Injector-Tester.
Mercedes C280 M104 Turbo

Mobilelpg
Posts:37
Joined:Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:08 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by Mobilelpg » Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:55 pm

Is it possible to have a TPS option in the knock sensor strategy.
I have a large LED cluster that lights up to report knock, this works perfectly apart from every time I come off the throttle at high revs the knock sensor value exceeds the noise threshold and causes the light to illuminate...which is extremely bright and aimed directly at my face for obvious reasons :D :D
I would like to be able to tell the ecu to ignore any knock readings when the throttle is released or below a certain figure.

Edward.

pric
Posts:57
Joined:Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:41 pm
Location:Austria

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by pric » Sun Sep 11, 2016 8:39 pm

Or when Map is under a certain value. (35kPA or so)

Id like to set my knock engine noise table as low as possible, and my knock control very harsh for safety reasons. (ignition tuning on the road
So, sometimes the spike when i let of the throttle is so big/makes so much retard, that i got Knock related Ignition retard still in the next gear.
Mercedes C280 M104 Turbo

Scooter
Posts:44
Joined:Thu Nov 12, 2015 3:08 am

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by Scooter » Thu Sep 15, 2016 7:21 pm

Is there an easy way to save Table files and bring them into Excel?....I would like to smooth out some of my tables. -Thanks

PSI-Motor
Posts:455
Joined:Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:57 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by PSI-Motor » Thu Sep 15, 2016 7:50 pm

Scooter wrote:Is there an easy way to save Table files and bring them into Excel?....I would like to smooth out some of my tables. -Thanks
Smooth out? You have 3D graph and visual 2D!
EcuMaster Sweden

User avatar
Jadzwin
Site Admin
Posts:1445
Joined:Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:27 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by Jadzwin » Thu Sep 15, 2016 8:15 pm

You can also use E key that smooth out the selected cells

Scooter
Posts:44
Joined:Thu Nov 12, 2015 3:08 am

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by Scooter » Thu Sep 15, 2016 11:04 pm

E key helps out a lot. I wasn't aware of that. Thanks....Is there any reason why you cannot copy and paste into notepad or excel?

nickbmw
Posts:134
Joined:Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:23 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by nickbmw » Sun Sep 18, 2016 6:57 pm

Τhe EMU lacks fully configurable correction tables for ignition and fueling. You could add one correction table for each segment, that can have fully configurable x and y axxis, so the user can induce correction strategies based on his needs. Most other ECUs offer this.

WHPZach
Posts:184
Joined:Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:13 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by WHPZach » Tue Sep 20, 2016 6:18 pm

nickbmw wrote:Τhe EMU lacks fully configurable correction tables for ignition and fueling. You could add one correction table for each segment, that can have fully configurable x and y axxis, so the user can induce correction strategies based on his needs. Most other ECUs offer this.
It's always a challenge to balance ease of use with configurability. What kinds of corrections do you want that aren't already available?

nickbmw
Posts:134
Joined:Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:23 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by nickbmw » Tue Sep 20, 2016 11:57 pm

WHPZach wrote:
nickbmw wrote:Τhe EMU lacks fully configurable correction tables for ignition and fueling. You could add one correction table for each segment, that can have fully configurable x and y axxis, so the user can induce correction strategies based on his needs. Most other ECUs offer this.
It's always a challenge to balance ease of use with configurability. What kinds of corrections do you want that aren't already available?
For example, one advance correction table that the x and y axxis will be configurable to anything possible, eg gear, rpm, coolant, tps, map, oil temp, oil press. So for instance, we can set the x axxis at gear, set the values 1 to 6, then select y axxis as rpm, and use this table to remove advance in 5th and 6th gear at low rpm. Or use ect vs rpm to remove advance when ect is rising, for example in circuit/track day use.
Or for fueling, set the x axxis to gear, y to rpm, and use the table to add some fuel when in 6th gear and high rpm which means a high speed run. Iat vs rpm, to add fuel when iat is rising at high rpm. Iat vs gear, add fuel when iat is rising at high rpm and in high gears.
All these are just examples ofcourse, having these maps with selectable axxis parameters gives you the chance to make your own strategy per application, depending on the needs.

PSI-Motor
Posts:455
Joined:Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:57 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by PSI-Motor » Wed Sep 21, 2016 3:46 am

It will come on the PRO. I don't see it necesary on the basic emu. Never had a problem not having it on the current one and still we are wining Swedish Timeattack, drifting and dragracing. The fastest BMW:s in the BMW series has emu without any problems.

But yes i see what you mean! You have to be able to distinguish a entry level ecu against a much more expensive or a motorsport ecu.
The EMU is suppose to be a straight forward ecu for public use.
EcuMaster Sweden

nickbmw
Posts:134
Joined:Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:23 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by nickbmw » Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:57 pm

PSI-Motor wrote:It will come on the PRO. I don't see it necesary on the basic emu. Never had a problem not having it on the current one and still we are wining Swedish Timeattack, drifting and dragracing. The fastest BMW:s in the BMW series has emu without any problems.

But yes i see what you mean! You have to be able to distinguish a entry level ecu against a much more expensive or a motorsport ecu.
The EMU is suppose to be a straight forward ecu for public use.
I am mainly looking at competitive ECUs, for example a Haltech 1000 has this feature, as does a Link G4+ Storm. As far as i know the new EMU Black will also not have this feature

PSI-Motor
Posts:455
Joined:Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:57 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by PSI-Motor » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:06 pm

nickbmw wrote:
PSI-Motor wrote:It will come on the PRO. I don't see it necesary on the basic emu. Never had a problem not having it on the current one and still we are wining Swedish Timeattack, drifting and dragracing. The fastest BMW:s in the BMW series has emu without any problems.

But yes i see what you mean! You have to be able to distinguish a entry level ecu against a much more expensive or a motorsport ecu.
The EMU is suppose to be a straight forward ecu for public use.
I am mainly looking at competitive ECUs, for example a Haltech 1000 has this feature, as does a Link G4+ Storm. As far as i know the new EMU Black will also not have this feature

Yes but they lack many other features that EMU has and still they are more expensive with less inputs / outputs, can bus, drive by wire, passive coil support, Haltech has a tiny 250kpa mapsensor.
Non of the above doesn't even have EGT inputs or lambda control built in.

I swapped out MANY Link / Vipec and Haltechs for EMU and all of them are more than satisfied.
EcuMaster Sweden

Karel
Posts:408
Joined:Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:58 am
Location:Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by Karel » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:44 pm

Like you say. EMU is very fast forward ECU. I can do nearly every engine on it , and modify functions at no time even on races, pit-stops etc. It very easy to react on drivers demands. First ECU using tuning software including logger. Many of "TOP" brands like Motec, Pectel, Haltech etc was very distrubing for me to use, because the logging software was separated from tuning software.

nickbmw
Posts:134
Joined:Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:23 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by nickbmw » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:39 am

I am not blaming the EMU guys, i am also happy with it. It is an excellent product. I am just saying these correction tables would be very nice to have, and it is something that is offered by the competition so i think it's not over the top to request something similar. Or at least add it as a feature on the EMu Black

WHPZach
Posts:184
Joined:Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:13 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by WHPZach » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:49 am

nickbmw wrote:I am not blaming the EMU guys, i am also happy with it. It is an excellent product. I am just saying these correction tables would be very nice to have, and it is something that is offered by the competition so i think it's not over the top to request something similar. Or at least add it as a feature on the EMu Black
Much of what you've requested can be accomplished by other means than custom axes. For example, the timer functions are excellent for road racing in lieu of what you've asked for with fuel and ignition modification related to gear position. There are several ways around every problem, and the EMU feature set will solve 99% of problems as it sits.

samvel
Posts:256
Joined:Fri Aug 15, 2014 9:44 pm
Location:Tallinn, Estonia
Contact:

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by samvel » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:44 pm

Karel wrote:First ECU using tuning software including logger.
Really? Quite a bold statement.
www.esracing.ee / www.facebook.com/esracingestonia

Sm887
Posts:23
Joined:Sun Apr 10, 2016 10:27 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by Sm887 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:43 am

It would have been great if we could have a frozen value for idle ign. angle. So that the ing. angle would be independent of the ing. map and all other settings that effects ign. Like IAT correction for ign angle.

An "Idle IGN Angle VS CLT" would have been perfect

nickbmw
Posts:134
Joined:Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:23 pm

Re: Bugs and Feature reqests

Post by nickbmw » Fri Sep 23, 2016 10:00 am

Sm887 wrote:It would have been great if we could have a frozen value for idle ign. angle. So that the ing. angle would be independent of the ing. map and all other settings that effects ign. Like IAT correction for ign angle.

An "Idle IGN Angle VS CLT" would have been perfect
This is already possible. And you already have a CLT vs idle ignition advance (correction).

Locked